
|
Above we have a balanced set of functions in the form Y .= .(x4 + 8x3 + 19x2 + 12x) times Q Q varies from 1/8, the bluest curve -- to 2, the tallest curve. Since the ratios between the coefficients stay constant, the functions stack their points of identity. These being: the relative maximums and minimums, which stack on lines, and the functions' natural roots, which stack in place. asdf The natural root is a term I use to describe the roots at the level the function crosses the Y axis. Here the function crosses Y at 0, so there is no difference between the "natural root", and the zero root -- or simply "the root" -- where the function equals 0. If we added a numercial coefficient, (say 2): ..Y .= .x4 + 8x3 + 19x2 + 12x + 2 It would cross Y at 2: and the natural roots would be those places it returned to 2 again. Although generally speaking, we look for the zero root of an equation -- because we want to solve it -- mathematics is much more forthcoming in revealing the natural roots. Here, roots are as they appear: 0, -1, -3, -4. asdf I speak of these functions as being balanced. By that I mean they have left-right symmetry -- a rarity in mixed higher degree curves. ( I tailored them carefully for this occasion. ) I can't really say why they're balanced -- it would be a wonderful avenue to pursue... The numerical difference between the coefficients is 7, 11, 7 The difference between the roots is 1, 2, 1 Math is saying something. .Once it's understood, it should be both coherant and unexpected. asdf Now let's take a look at the relative maxima and minima. These being fourth degree curves, they are entitled to reverse themselves up to three times. And do so splendidly. There's a way to find the X values of these reversals, and it's quite simple -- but it comes with caveats. First the method: . Solve the function you get by multiplying each coefficient by its exponent. If there is a numerical coefficient -- leave it out, it will throw everything off. asdf Y .= .x4 + 8x3 + 19x2 + 12x + 6 will have its maxima and minima at the 0 roots of 4x4 + 24x3 + 38x2 + 12x asdf But! 1: There will be an extra solution, (a zero). 2: I do not trust the complex space answers this method returns -- The initial i values are red herrings, not to be considered. The complex x values may be more subtly flawed. |
|
|